Don’t buy new XC skis, and don’t buy waxless

It’s been a snowy December here in New Hampshire, and one of the cool things about Lebanon is that there is a rail trail that runs maybe 25 miles southeast, with nice mellow grades and pleasant scenery, first through town, then along the shores of Mascoma river and Mascoma lake.  When 16″ of snow fell a week or two ago, Alexis and I set off on the trail with our friend Emily to enjoy the tail end of the storm, picture perfect with the snow on the rocks in the river and lights sparkling on the houses.

At the end of the trip just for fun I swapped skis with Alexis, and discovered immediately how much waxless skis suck.  She has a set of fairly modern waxless skis from LL Bean, that she got secondhand somewhere.  I’ve always had wax skis, first wooden ones, then a set of old “modern” composite MT53s that I got as hand-me-downs from my dad, and I never tried the waxless type.  I was amazed that they have almost no glide at all, and they make an annoying vibration (not loud, but you feel it in your feet).  The skis in question were almost as long as my regular ones, and by the sliding paper method I confirmed that they weren’t too soft for me or anything.  They just suck – in retrospect it’s amazing that Alexis assented to go skiing given their performance.  She tried mine in turn and declared the difference remarkable.

Since it was just before Christmas, I went in to Beans in West Leb and then to a ski shop over by Home Despot, and discovered that with the exception of skimpy skating gear (and burly on-piste tele stuff) nobody seems to even sell an old fashioned plain wax cross country ski.  They pretty much only sell these fishscale marvels, and for ~200 bucks, skis only, no boots/poles/bindings.  The friendly salesman said that they didn’t have any used gear and it’s really hard to find.  Skeptical, I stopped in on the way home at the Listen thrift store in Lebanon, and looked in their rack.  And Lo, while the majority of equipment was scaly, there was one solid pair of Beans’ wax skis in used but not worn condition; by the color maybe 10-15 years vintage.   Normal price for used xc skis at Listen is apparently $12, but these were on clearance for $4, indicating no apparent shortage of used equipment.  They had funny bindings on them (SNS or NNN or some modern stuff, not sure which type), but I was happy to find that the screw pattern on the 3 pin bindings of her old skis matched that of the new skis, and resulted in approximately the same toe position.

Things are crusty here as a result of several warm days and some rain, but I can’t wait for the next snow to come so we can try them out.  Now, maybe I’m not being perfectly fair; maybe that particular model of ski that she got was a dud; maybe she needs some glide wax (though I haven’t applied glide wax in a decade and haven’t felt the lack of it); surely in sloping terrain that was constantly at the limit of grip one might wish for more grip at the expense of glide.  And to hear it from the internet makes it seem as if waxing requires a Nobel prize or something – maybe for racers it does.  But for everyday rail trail/golf course/state park type conditions, I can’t see why anybody would want waxless skis, and in any case I can’t see why the casual XC skier would ever buy new, when there’s such a profusion of decent gear in the thrift shops.  I subsequently talked to my dad in Maine, who confirmed that good quality XC gear shows up constantly at the Georgetown “Mall” (transfer station), and that he has a heap of it in the corner of his barn.

I don’t know how to categorize this post – I haven’t created a category for “indignant rant” so maybe I should, but that seems too blog-ish somehow.  Mostly it started me thinking about how much marginally useful stuff is purchased, constantly and especially around the end of each year, and wondering what kind of economy we could have if people at once found themselves unable to afford it and realized that often it’s unnecessary, and in many other cases can be had for pennies on the dollar.  At what point does it become true that more stuff is not the most efficient way to more happiness?  And if circumstances dictate that at least temporarily more stuff is not in the cards for most of us, what sorts of optimizations are possible?

To give an example I’ve been cogitating on for years, it has always seemed ridiculous that most canoes sit idle 363 days of each year, and many casual outdoorspeople own canoes despite their infrequent use.  Most outdoor gear (though certainly not climbing ropes and the like) fall into this mold.  Why not have an online arrangement (similar to zipcar or web carpooling sites) that facilitates friends and neighbors borrowing or renting gear from one another, such that each of us doesn’t need to own a road bike AND a mountain bike AND XC skis AND alpine skis AND snowboards AND snowshoes AND canoes AND kayaks AND yadda yadda.  Of course there are damage and liability issues, but given the massive personal savings involved, it seems likely that these could be integrated and made affordable in the aggregate so that users come out way ahead.


One Response to “Don’t buy new XC skis, and don’t buy waxless”

  1. pcstage Says:

    Excellent and true. Your views about waxless skis are correct. I just bought these
    and returned them (thank goodness). I have a 25 year old pair of wax Kneissl skis, and when my boots totally split (they’re old and cracking) I will buy Fischer waxable skis.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: